Nº. 1 of  1

Manufactured

Posts tagged linguistics:

The Pleasure of the Text

by Roland Barthes

   Is not the most erotic portion of a body where the garment drapes? In perversion (which is the realm of textual pleasure) there are no “erogenous zones” (a foolish expression, besides); it is intermittence, as psychoanalysis has so rightly stated, which is erotic: the intermittence of skin flashing between two articles of clothing (trousers and sweater), between two edges (the open-necked shirt, the glove and the sleeve), it is this flash itself which seduces, or rather: the staging of an appearance-as-disappearance.

    The pleasure of the text is not the pleasure of the corporeal striptease or of narrative suspense. In these cases, there is no tear, no edges: a gradual unveiling: the entire excitation takes refuge in the hopeof seeing the sexual organ (schoolboy’s dream) or in knowing the end of the story (novelistic satisfaction). Paradoxically (since it is mass-consumed), this is a far more intellectual pleasure than the other: an Oedipal please (to denude, to know, to learn the origin and the end)… 

Our language contains innumerable ghosts. Supposing I say “the lightning flashes.” Surely the flashing is the same as the lightning. There is not one thing called lightning and another called flashing. The lightning is the flashing.

Alan Watts